posted on 2020-05-13, 09:15authored byYen Teik LEE
<table><tr>
<td><p>In this
paper, we investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms, in particular,
the market for corporate control, affects shareholder‟s wealth, both in the
short and long run when firms repurchase their shares. Also, we examine
whether information content on corporate governance mechanisms subsumes that
of earnings management.</p><br>
<br>
<p>We find that repurchasing firms that have less antitakeover
provisions (ATPs), being subject more to the disciplinary power of the market
for corporate control, experience significantly stronger short run upon and
long run abnormal returns after open market share repurchase announcements
than those with more ATPs. A zero-investment strategy that buys firms with
less ATPs and sells short those with more yields 0.45% (significant at 10%)
in the short run and 9.6% per year (significant at 1%) in the long run. The
zero-investment alpha that buys firms that manage earnings upwards and sells
short those that manage downwards the most is nonetheless insignificant.
However, for firms that manage their earnings downwards, the zero-investment
alpha on the two extreme ATP portfolio returns a staggering 20.4%
(significant at 0.1%). This paper provides evidence that investors respond
more strongly to repurchase announcements by well governed firms, in support
of information signaling hypothesis and that corporate governance
characteristics subsume information content on earnings management.</p><p><br></p><table><tr>
<td><p>See
working paper: <a href="https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5213/" target="_blank">Open market share repurchase programs and
corporate governance: Company performance</a> (2015)</p></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>