posted on 2020-05-14, 09:51authored byTiecheng LENG
<table><tr>
<td><p>This
dissertation investigates the impact of political factors on firm corporate
policies. In the first essay, I investigate whether political uncertainty
affects firm innovation, using United States gubernatorial elections as a
source of plausibly exogenous variation in uncertainty. I find that firm
innovation productivity, captured by patent counts and citations, declines
3.8% and 5.5% respectively in the year leading up to an election and quickly
reverses afterward. This finding is robust to various specifications and
endogeneity concerns. Incumbent Republican regime is negatively associated
with innovation, and the negative effect of political uncertainty on
innovation only exists in elections where the incumbent governor is a
Republican. Finally, I find that the uncertainty effect is more pronounced in
elections with high levels of uncertainty, in politically sensitive and
non-regulated industries, and in firms subject to less binding financing
constraints.</p>
<br>
<p>The second essay (jointly with Jerry Cao, Brandon Julio and Sili
Zhou) examines the impact of political influence and ownership on corporate
investment by exploiting the unique way provincial leaders are selected and
promoted in China. The tournament-style promotion system creates incentives
for new provincial governors to exert their influence over capital
allocation, particularly during the early years of their term. Using a
neighboring-province difference-in-differences estimation approach, we find
that there is a divergence in investment rates between state owned
enterprises (SOEs) and non-state owned enterprises (non-SOEs) following
political turnover. SOEs experience an abnormal increase in investment by
6.0% in the year following the turnover, consistent with the incentives of a
new governor to stimulate investment. In contrast, investment rates for
non-SOEs decline significantly postturnover, suggesting that the political
influence exerted over SOEs crowds out private investment. The effects of
political turnover on investment are mainly driven by normal turnovers, and
turnovers with less-educated or local-born successors. Finally, we provide
evidence that the political incentives around the turnover of provincial
governors represent a misallocation of capital as measures of investment
efficiency decline post-turnover.</p><p><br></p><table><tr>
<td><p>The
dissertation comprise 2 papers available at:</p><br>
<p>1. <a href="https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6421/" target="_blank">The bright side of political uncertainty: The
case of R&D. 2015. Working paper</a>.</p><br>
<p>2. <a href="https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6420/" target="_blank">Political turnovers, ownership, and corporate
investment in China. 2016. Working paper</a>.</p></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>