1. Forces of Corruption: Effects of Power on Perceptions of Openness & Information-Sharing

2. Author Information
	A. Li Jiaying
		Institution: Singapore Management University	
		E-mail: jiaying.li.2018@smu.edu.sg
	B. Tsai Ming-Hong
		Institution: Singapore Management University	
		E-mail: mhtsai@smu.edu.sg

3. Data collected from 10 Oct 2020 - 15 Oct 2020 

4. Collected in Singapore, Singapore Management University

5. Research credits or $5 were given as compensation



Data & File Overview

1. File List:
RawData, FinalSyntax, FinalDataset



Methodological Information:
1. Study was conducted online, remotely due to COVID-19 restrictions
2. Data was analyzed in SPSS - using mainly mixed-effects regression models to account for dyadic relations

Coding Categories:

Discussion_Initiative	
Sentence indicates that participant starts the discussion or invites partner to start the discussion
Clarification of task objective is not considered. 	

Shall we start discussion?
Here's my idea…
What are some of your ideas?
What do you think of the ideas?	
E.g. what are we supposed to do? Is not considered.


Idea_Sharing	
Participant shares his/her own idea 	
Shares own idea, sharing only the number of the idea is also considered (e.g. idea no. 3)	
Only ideas relating to plastic bottles are considered.


Agreement_with_Partner	
Participant agrees with something shared by partner (e.g. agrees when partner provides ideas or suggests adopting a particular strategy)	Sounds good!

Ok!
Sounds cute.
Sure.	

Agreement with suggestions to direct discussion in a particular way (e.g. if partner suggests to google, to focus on practical ideas) are also considered.


Idea_Elaboration_Self	
Participant elaborates on his/her own idea	
If participant copies the description of ideas provided, it is considered to be elaboration of idea. 
Opinions on idea (I think it is practical, I use it too) are also considered.
Elaboration on one point is coded as one instance. 
Elaboration on the same point but across multiple messages are hence still coded as one instance.

	 
Probing_PartnerToElaborate	
Participant invites partner to elaborate more on partner's ideas (asks or solicits for more information)	

Do you mean….?
How will that work?
Which idea number is that?

	 
ProvideInput_onPartnerIdeas	
Participant provides own opinions/input/elaborates on partner's ideas	
Elaboration on one point is coded as one instance. 
Elaboration on the same point but across multiple messages are hence still coded as one instance.	 

Based on your idea, we can also……


Probing_PartnerForMoreIdeas	
Participant asks partner to provide more ideas	Do you have more ideas?

Please provide more ideas.	 


Leadership_Initiative	
Takes charge of the discussion - takes initiative to compile ideas, suggests a particular strategy	
Asks partner for opinion (e.g. what do you think of this idea? What do you think of my idea)?

The ideas that we have agreed upon are…..
We should focus on practical ideas…	

 
Discovery_DifferentIdeas	
Explicitly discovers different ideas are provided	
Explicitly realises that different ideas are provided. Some dyads may have worked on the presumption that different ideas were given - these are not counted. Only explicit discoveries of different ideas are considered.	 


Duration of Discussion	
Calculated based on duration between the first message and last message (discussion-related)	

First message: Hi
Last message: We can leave the chat now. Bye!	
Sidetrack messages are not considered (e.g. talking about their personal background).

DiscussionDuration_Seconds	Converted to seconds